Some Surprising Numbers From Cleveland

2016-05-12T15:49:24+00:00 May 12th, 2016|


By Anne Trubek 

There were fewer people living in Cleveland’s Ohio City neighborhood in 2013 than there were in 2000. That is one of many surprising facts in The Cleveland Foundation’s The Pulse: A Look at Greater Cleveland by the NumbersPublished by Crain’s Custom Media, the report contains information such as the above, as well as stories about various aspects of life in Cleveland, which were “commissioned by sponsors and/or clients, who control the content.”

The report contains many deplorable trends that have been well-documented elsewhere: the county receives an F for number of high ozone days; 13.67% of children under 72 months in the city of Cleveland have elevated lead levels, and heroin deaths are rising. It also contains some upward trajectories: the percentage of high school graduates from the Cleveland Municipal School District is slowly rising and the crime rate is down.

The data confirms what those who live in Cleveland and travel by air know well: since United pulled its hub from Cleveland Hopkins, flights have declined precipitously, from 79,708 in 2013 to only 48,925 in 2015.

For those who follow the press about how Cleveland is attracting educated white millennials to the city, particularly to downtown and near west side neighborhoods, the numbers are also surprising:

  • The increase in college graduates living downtown is only 1,950 people over the past 13 years. Although the study prefaces with the data by stating “downtown Cleveland is the top gainer in brain gain within the city and Cuyahoga County, with a 138.6% change in college graduates,” the 138.6% figure is more indicative of how few college graduates lived downtown before 2000 than it is a surge in new residents (although any net increase is welcome). Strongsville saw the largest increase in raw numbers during this period, with a gain of 2,980. Tremont saw a gain in college graduates of 565; Ohio City’s gain was 509.
  • The population of Ohio City and Tremont decreased between 2000-2013 (see graphic below). Both neighborhoods saw increases in millennials, but not enough to offset larger losses in younger and older residents.
  • Cuyahoga County continues to depopulate, losing 1.6% of its population between 2010 and 2014.

Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 11.43.26 AM


The take-away from this quick look at the report? Data, as we all know, can be interpreted variously, and looking at raw numbers, as opposed to percentage changes in millennial-aged college graduates, can be eye opening.

graphic from The Pulse

Related stories on Cleveland demographics can be found here, here and here



  1. EdwardofEuclid1988 May 12, 2016 at 2:29 pm - Reply

    Is it possible that when 35 year-olds begin to start families, and their children reach school age, that’s when it’s time to move out?

    While you’re attracting millennials, what is being done to make sure they stay?

    • Chris May 13, 2016 at 10:44 am - Reply

      That’s a good theory. My Brother-in-law moved from Tremont in his early to mid-thirties as he started a family.

    • Payton May 19, 2016 at 12:34 pm - Reply

      Yes, that’s a big part of why cities often show migration losses. Jill moves in, Jack moves in = +2. Jill & Jack meet and have baby Jane, then move out = -3. Net: -1.

      Similarly, gentrification of existing housing usually leads to population decline, because richer people live in larger houses. A house that comfortably housed a family of five now is “not really enough space” for two yuppies + one dog.

Leave A Comment